Cyprus overturns UK woman’s conviction for making up rape

The Supreme Court in Cyprus has overturned the conviction of a British woman given a four-month suspended sentence for making up claims that she was gang-raped by as many as a dozen Israelis during a vacation in Cyprus in 2019, according to defence lawyers.

Michael Polak, who was among a team of lawyers representing the woman, called Monday’s decision a “watershed moment” for the woman and others “around the world who find themselves in similar positions”.

Polak said the Supreme Court agreed with the defence that the British woman did not receive a fair trial and that important fair trial provisions were “totally disregarded in this case”.

He said the “young, vulnerable woman was not only mistreated” when she reported the rape to police but was also put through a trial that was “manifestly unfair” as the Supreme Court found.

Polak said the defence team fought the case with “one hand tied behind our back” and that “a decision as to guilt had been made before the proceedings had even started”.

Lawyer Nicoletta Charalambidou called the ruling “a very important day for women’s rights” in Cyprus and said the defence team would now try to get to the bottom of why authorities failed to “effectively investigate” the rape claims.

In a statement, the woman’s family expressed relief that Cypriot authorities “recognised the flaws in their legal process”.

“Whilst this decision doesn’t excuse the way she was treated by the police or the judge or those in authority, it does bring with it the hope that my daughter’s suffering will at least bring positive changes in the way victims of crime are treated,” the statement said.

Defence lawyers had said that the woman – whose identity has not been formally released and was 19 at the time of her trial – was suffering from a stress disorder and had been pressured into making an “unreliable” retraction.

They said the “discourteous” lower court judge Michalis Papathanasiou did not give defence lawyers the chance to put forward evidence supporting the woman’s claims.

‘Evasive’ statements

Judge Papathanasiou said in his original ruling that the woman defendant did not tell the truth and tried to deceive the court with “evasive” statements in her testimony.

He said the woman had admitted to investigators that she made up the claims because she was “ashamed” after finding out that some of the Israelis had videoed her having consensual sex with her Israeli boyfriend on their mobile phones.

A group of activists who gathered at the steps of the Supreme Court and held up banners reading “I Believe Her” and “The Patriarchy Arms Rapists, Judges” cheered and clapped as the ruling was announced.

Prior to the Supreme Court ruling, the British government had said it had raised “numerous concerns” with Cypriot authorities about the judicial process in the case and the woman’s right to a fair trial.