NASA says Artemis Accords envision ‘Star Trek’ future for moon

Accords seek to establish global principals for lunar colonisation, including letting firms own resources they mine.

NASA Artemis Accords
The Artemis Accords are a key part of NASA's effort to court allies around its plan to build a long-term presence on the lunar surface under its Artemis moon programme [File: Brendan McDermid/Reuters]

NASA on Friday set the stage for a global debate over the basic principles governing how humans will live and work on the moon, as it released the main tenets of an international pact for moon exploration called the Artemis Accords.

The accords seek to establish “safety zones” that would surround future moon bases to prevent what NASA, the United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, called “harmful interference” from rival countries or companies operating in close proximity.

The accords would also permit companies to own the lunar resources they mine, a crucial element in allowing NASA contractors to convert the moon’s water ice into ingredients for rocket fuel or mine lunar minerals to construct landing pads.

The accords are a key part of NASA’s effort to court allies around its plan to build a long-term presence on the lunar surface under its Artemis moon programme.

“What we’re doing is we are implementing the Outer Space Treaty with the Artemis Accords,” NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine told Reuters news agency, referring to a 1967 international pact that emphasises that space should be used for peaceful rather than military uses.

The framework will be used as an incentive for nations to adhere to US norms of behaviour in space, he added.

“It applies to Low Earth Orbit; it applies to the moon as well,” Bridenstine said. The accords also require countries to adopt standards of the United Nations Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines – which govern the prevention of hazardous space debris – and the UN Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space, which would require countries to provide orbital details of their “space objects”.

The US Congress passed a law in 2015 allowing companies to own the resources they mine in outer space, but no such laws exist in the international community. The Artemis Accords, consistent with the space policy of the administration of US President Donald Trump, appear to clear the way for companies to mine the moon under international law and urge countries to enact similar national laws that would bind their private sector’s space operations.

“Why would private companies take the risk of going to mine resources if the legal situation was they could be kept from owning them?” Lori Garver, former deputy administrator of NASA, asked Reuters. “So anything this does to clear any of that up could really help advance progress in space development.”

China and Russia

Reuters reported earlier this month that the Trump administration was drawing up the Artemis Accords.

In response, Russia’s space agency chief Dmitry Rogozin criticised Washington for excluding Russia from early negotiations over the space exploration pact, drawing parallels with US foreign policy in the Middle East.

“The principle of invasion is the same, whether it be the Moon or Iraq. The creation of a ‘coalition of the willing’ is initiated,” Rogozin wrote on Twitter. “Only Iraq or Afghanistan will come out of this.”

China said it was willing to cooperate with all parties on lunar exploration “to make a greater contribution in building a community with shared future for mankind,” a spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry said in a statement faxed to Reuters.

The safety zones – while intended to encourage coordination – have prompted questions on whether the accords align with the Outer Space Treaty, which states the moon and other celestial bodies are “not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.”

The size of the safety zones would vary depending on the nature of the site they surround and would not constitute appropriation, Bridenstine said.

They would follow the principle that “basically says I’m gonna stay out of your way, you’re gonna stay out of my way, and we can all operate in this space,” he added.

However, there is a question over who determines the sizes of the safety zones, said Ram Jakhu, associate professor at McGill University’s Institute of Air and Space Law in Canada. “Safety zones are necessary, but they can also be abused in a way that it may become appropriation.”

But Mike Gold, NASA’s associate administrator for international relations, told Reuters the language on moon mining shouldn’t worry other nations.

“The principles that are being put forward here is nothing that we believe any responsible spacefaring nation would disagree with,” he said.

“Via the Artemis Accords, we hope that the future will look a lot more like Star Trek, and a lot less like Star Wars by getting ahead of these issues,” Gold said.  

Source: Reuters