Pakistan latest updates: Court rules Khan’s move unconstitutional

Pakistan news from April 7: Top court rules PM Khan’s move to dissolve parliament and call new elections illegal.

Pakistan Supreme Court
A general view of Pakistan's Supreme Court, where petitions for dissolving parliament by Prime Minister Imran Khan are being heard, in Islamabad [Anjum Naveed/AP]
  • Pakistan’s Supreme Court has ruled that Prime Minister Imran Khan’s move to dissolve parliament and call for early elections was illegal.
  • The court has ordered the National Assembly or parliament to reconvene and hold a no-confidence vote that could lead to Khan’s removal from office.
  • The political crisis erupted last week when Khan lost his parliamentary majority and was on the verge of being forced from office by a no-confidence motion tabled by the opposition.
  • But the deputy speaker of parliament threw out the motion, ruling it was unconstitutional and part of a foreign conspiracy. Khan then dissolved parliament.
  • The standoff has thrown the country of 220 million people, ruled by the military for extended periods since independence in 1947, into a full-blown constitutional crisis.

This live blog is now closed, thank you for joining us.

There were the updates on the Pakistan political crisis on April 7:

Khan to convene cabinet meeting

The prime minister has called a cabinet meeting on Friday to discuss the situation in the country. He said he will also address the nation.

“My message to our nation is I have always and will continue to fight for Pak till the last ball,” he wrote on Twitter.

‘Politics of lies, deceit buried’: Opposition leader

Leader of the opposition Shehbaz Sharif has said the Supreme Court’s decision meant the “people of Pakistan have won”, while congratulating all who “supported, defended and campaigned for the supremacy of the constitution”.

“Today, politics of lies, deceit and allegations has been buried”, he tweeted.

Supreme court decision ‘unfortunate’: Former minister

Fawad Chaudhry of the ruling party Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has said the decision by the country’s top court was ” unfortunate” and has “exacerbated the political crisis” in Pakistan.

“Immediate elections could have brought stability to the country. Unfortunately, the importance of the people has been overlooked. Let’s see how things go,” he tweeted.

‘Landmark historic day’ for constitution: Lawyer

Supreme Court lawyer Haider Zaman Qureshi said the decision by the nation’s top court was a “landmark historic day” for the constitution, Pakistan and all the democratic forces in the country.

“When the [no-confidence] motion is carried forward … we are very confident that we have the numbers we will succeed in our motion,” he told Al Jazeera.

“The Supreme Court has ordered in today’s order that that session will not be prorogued by the speaker. And in that very session, the new leader of the house, ie the prime minister, will be elected.”

“We will have a coalition government of the opposition forces and we will build bridges and we will take Pakistan out of this economic meltdown that this outgoing government brought us.”

Daniyal Aziz, former minister for privatisation and leader of Pakistan Muslim League
Daniyal Aziz, former minister for privatisation and leader of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), displays a newspaper as he speaks to the media at the Supreme Court of Pakistan in Islamabad, Pakistan on April 7, 2022 [Akhtar Soomro/Reuters]


Pakistan court rules blocking of no-confidence vote was unconstitutional

Pakistan’s top court has ruled the blocking of a no-confidence vote to remove Prime Minister Imran Khan and the subsequent dissolution of parliament was unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court also ordered the country’s parliament be reconvened on April 9 in order to proceed with the no-confidence vote.

The court said a decision by the assembly speaker to not allow a no-confidence vote on Sunday “is declared to be contrary to the constitution and of no legal effect, and is set aside”.

New elections only solution: Former minister

Former Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry has said that irrespective of the court’s decision, Pakistan would head towards new elections, as this would be the only solution to all the problems the country was facing.

Ex-PM Nawaz Sharif: Slamming deputy speaker’s ruling not enough

“The deputy speaker’s ruling was against the constitution and law. It will not be enough to declare it null and void,” former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said.

Sharif, who is in London, issued the statement ahead of a Supreme Court verdict on the speaker’s ruling that has dismissed the no-confidence motion against PM Khan.

He said that the constitution and the national interest require that the constitutional powers of parliament be restored immediately so that parliament can carry out its responsibilities and decisions in accordance with the constitution and the law.

Pakistan hikes policy rate to tackle rising inflation, falling reserves

The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has announced an increase of 250 basis points in the benchmark policy rate, taking it to 12.25 percent in a “strong and proactive policy response”.

This response was necessitated by a deterioration in outlook for inflation and an increase in risks to external stability since its last meeting, the central bank said in a statement.

Poll body should reconsider elections stance: Former minister

The Election Commission of Pakistan should reconsider its position of needing at least four months to hold polls, former Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry tweeted.

“Attempting to hold elections for more than 90 days would be a serious violation of the Constitution. The economy cannot tolerate seven months of political turmoil.”

Security personnel from the Frontier Constabulary stand guard outside the Supreme Court
Security personnel from the Frontier Constabulary stand guard outside the Supreme Court where the hearing of petitions for dissolving parliament by the country’s prime minister is occurring, in Islamabad, Pakistan on April 7, 2022 [Anjum Naveed/AP Photo]

Pakistan’s poll body says fresh elections not possible in 90 days

The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has responded to President Arif Alvi and said it was not possible to hold elections in 90 days, as announced earlier.

The poll body said it would require at least four months to complete the process of delimitation of constituencies and other preparations for the elections.

On Wednesday, the president had asked the ECP to propose dates for the general elections in the country.

Court hearing adjourned, verdict on Thursday evening

The chief justice of Pakistan has adjourned the Supreme Court hearing and says a verdict will be delivered at 7:30pm (14:30 GMT) on Thursday.

Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial remarked that it has been established that the ruling passed by the National Assembly deputy speaker was “erroneous”. He also said the court would quash the ruling and then see how to proceed in the future.

However, the chief justice indicated that the court was not going to fix responsibility, and said the court will proceed in the national interest and according to practical possibilities.

The top court is hearing multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of parliament’s deputy speaker throwing away the no-confidence motion moved by the opposition on April 3.

Riot policemen stand guard.
Riot policemen stand guard at the premises of the Supreme Court [Aamir Qureshi/AFP]

Four possible outcomes of top court’s verdict

Here are four possible outcomes of the Supreme Court’s ruling expected later on Thursday:

  1. The court could order parliament to be reconstituted and the motion to be tabled again.
  2. It could call for fresh elections that PM Imran Khan’s party has been pushing for.
  3. The court may bar Khan from power if he is found to have violated the constitution.
  4. It could also decide that it cannot intervene in parliamentary affairs.

Main opposition leader addresses top court bench

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Shehbaz Sharif rises up to address the five-judge bench at the Supreme Court.

“I am not a lawyer but a common man,” he said, according to Geo TV. “If deputy speaker’s ruling is erroneous, then parliament should be restored.”

Earlier, Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial said it was clear the April 3 ruling of parliament’s deputy speaker, which dismissed the no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Imran Khan, was erroneous.

“The real question at hand is what happens next,” the judge said.

Pakistan's opposition leader Shehbaz Sharif.
Pakistan’s opposition leader Shehbaz Sharif, leaves after a hearing outside the Supreme Court building in Islamabad [Aamir Qureshi/AFP]

Security beefed up at Supreme Court: TV report

Security has been tightened at the Supreme Court in anticipation of the crucial verdict.

The local Geo TV aired visuals of riot police taking their positions around the court building. Major roads leading to the court have been blocked.

The development came after Chief Justice Bandial said the court may announce its verdict on Thursday.

“God willing we are concluding today,” he said.

‘Where is the deputy speaker’s signature?’

Supreme Court judge, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel, asks why the deputy speaker’s ruling, which dismissed the no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Imran Khan, was not signed by him, Dawn news website reports.

The ruling, which threw out the opposition’s motion, was read out by Qasim Suri as National Assembly Speaker Asad Qaiser was absent. Justice Mandokhel said the ruling was announced by the deputy speaker but carried the signature of the speaker.

“Where is the deputy speaker’s signature?” Justice Mandokhel asked.

The judge also questioned the absence of the foreign minister from the House.

“Shouldn’t the foreign minister have been present?” he asked, prompting the government lawyer to admit the minister should have been present.

Supporters of Khan's PTI party shout slogans in his favour during a rally in Karachi
Supporters of Khan’s PTI party shout slogans in his favour during a rally in Karachi [Shahzeb Hahzaib Akber/EPA]

Government lawyer on top court’s jurisdiction

Attorney General Khalid Jawad Khan tells the Supreme Court that parliamentary proceedings were not exempt from judicial review, but the limits were to be defined by the court.

Lawyer Naeem Bukhari, who is representing parliament’s speaker and deputy speaker, argued that the top court had refrained from interfering in parliamentary proceedings in the past.

He asked whether the court would have taken notice of the matter if the speaker had dismissed former information minister Fawad Chaudhry’s point of order, which asked for a ruling on an alleged foreign conspiracy that Imran Khan says was linked with the opposition’s no-confidence motion.

Pakistani rupee falls to an all-time low

Amid the constitutional crisis, the Pakistani rupee has fallen to an all-time low of 188 rupees against the US dollar in the inter-bank market.

Analysts believe that political uncertainty following the dissolution of parliament was pushing the rupee to slide.

Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Shehbaz Sharif accused Imran Khan of “running away after leaving a legacy of broken economy”.

“Time to right all wrongs is NOW,” Sharif tweeted.

Read more here.

Khan ‘sabotaged constitution on April 3’: Sharif

PML-N leader and main opposition leader Shehbaz Sharif hopes the court will announce its verdict at the earliest.

Sharif said the political uncertainty has had a huge impact on the country’s economy, accusing Khan of its “poor handling”.

“Imran Niazi is an absolutely fraud,” Sharif said, adding that Khan “sabotaged the constitution on April 3”.

“If you want to save Pakistan, then you have to save the constitution and ensure free and fair elections,” he said. “I am sure the judges will protect the constitution.”

Calling opposition ‘traitors’ was a joke: ANP leader

Awami National Party (ANP) leader Mian Iftikhar says declaring the opposition leaders fighting for the supremacy of the constitution as “traitors” was a joke.

“On the other hand, those who violated the constitution were still ruling the country,” he told reporters outside the Supreme Court.

“We expect a decision that would strengthen the constitution and parliament.”

Academic Ayesha Jalal on what happens next in Pakistan

“You never know with Pakistan’s politics – anything is possible. After all, it is very rare for governments in Pakistan to complete a full term. But no matter what the Supreme Court decides about the no-confidence vote, it does look set that Pakistan will be heading to an election in the next 90 days.

“It will be a bitter, bitter election – and held in the middle of Pakistan’s hot summer. Uncertainty, politicking and potential unrest could dominate the next few months.


“The danger is that Khan will not accept an election loss and take his fight to supporters in the streets. If a political crisis becomes a law-and-order issue, the army – never far away from Pakistani politics, and seemingly losing patience with Khan – might decide enough is enough and move in.

“That said, there is little appetite among the population for a military dictatorship.”

‘Taken oath to protect constitution’: Ex-foreign minister

Former Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi denies his party has taken any unconstitutional steps.

“We have taken oath to protect the constitution,” he told reporters outside the Supreme Court.

He said parliament’s deputy speaker did not disallow the no-confidence motion but pointed towards “facts of political interference that tantamount to an effort for regime change”.

“The allegations can be probed,” he said. “In my opinion, the only solution to the current political crisis is fresh election.”

PM Khan to huddle with party leaders

Khan will chair a meeting of his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) party at his residence in the capital Islamabad at approximately 1pm (08:00 GMT), media reports said.

The PTI’s top leadership is meeting to devise their strategy in anticipation of a verdict by the Supreme Court.

Far-right party urges court to undo Khan’s moves

Pakistan’s far-right Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP), which rose to prominence in 2017 for its support of anti-blasphemy laws, has urged the Supreme Court to undo the decisions of Khan’s government.

In a statement issued late Wednesday, the TLP said it would not allow Khan’s government to make changes to the country’s constitution.

“If the deputy speaker’s ruling is condoned, then we fear Islamic provisions of the constitution would be violated and a non-Muslim could be appointed president or prime minister through a simple ruling,” says the statement, released in Urdu.

‘Pakistan and the constitution demand justice’

The leaders of opposition Pakistan’s Peoples Party (PPP) say they expect the top court to do justice and restore the National Assembly.

“It’s the fifth day that constitution is suspended in our country,” former deputy speaker Faisal Karim Kundi told reporters outside the Supreme Court.

“Pakistan and the constitution demand justice,” said PPP leader and Senator Sherry Rehman, who demanded that the members of Khan’s cabinet be put on the Exit Control List (ECL) so they are not able to leave the country and face accountability.

Supreme Court hearing enters fourth day

The top court is due to reconvene for a fourth day on Thursday at 9:30am (04:30 GMT).

The opposition has challenged the decision to block the no-confidence vote in the Supreme Court, which began deliberating the case on Monday.

Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial said: “Let’s start early from tomorrow to conclude the case,” at the end of a session on Wednesday in which defence lawyers offered a justification for Khan’s actions.

Pakistan inflation

Source: Al Jazeera and news agencies